What is Gravity?
Gravity - our current model has a problemAs far as gravity is concerned,
 Is it that our human brains don't have the power to comprehend gravity?
 Is it that we haven't developed a mental model that explains gravity?
My hypothesis is that gravity is the fundamental "basement" of science,
where the speed of light, waves and particles do not apply.
In this model, what we now call "mass" may not be "mass" at all.
To solve gravity, then, would require a re-definition of what we call "mass".
This doesn't fit models we need in our brains to visualize gravity.
In my hypothesis, when energy packets gain enough energy to reach a frequency
of about just over 6 TeraHertz, they somehow "fold over themselves" and break away
into discrete quanta that can exist as what we call "mass".
These quanta of varying "starting energy" then arrange themselves by net charge
to become building blocks like electrons, protons and neutrons.
As such, they can then form atoms, which then have net charges, that group to form "mass".
However, when the quanta "folded over themselves" they entered into a new realm
of existence where our current human thinking models don't work or explain.
Perhaps the "folding over" process locks in a tiny, permanent error in the net charge in it's being.
This tiny error, small but important, might somehow be a common bond that can be felt at a distance by other like items.
In my hypothesis, then, gravity itself could be a "sum of errors", created by this "folding over" process.
NOTE: Written by Val Patterson ("Rocky Patterson") Oct 18, 2008